nzbget port forwarding router web add nzb

#Nzbget port forwarding router web add nzb install
#Nzbget port forwarding router web add nzb update

I have also two more tunnels, one for the Transmission daemon (on the same device at port 9091) and the web interface of my router (on another device: 192.168.0.1:80) and I don't have problems with them at all, they all work like they should. In this case the tunnel is set to redirect 127.0.0.1:9092 (the local NZBGet port set in my NAS) to local port 8083 and right after I've made successfull ssh connection with the NAS, I should be able to open it in my browser at localhost:8083, but I'm not. There's no such thing as bad tunnel configuration, there's only two thing which should be set - remote IP and port and local port and that's prety much all, no need of special routing rules or something. If it works without tunneling, than there should be a problem with tunneling, right?ĭoes this tunneling create a transparent network or you need to configure some routing rules specially for NZBGet? OP, best of luck with your security choices.Hugbug wrote:I don't know much about ssh tunnels but the first thing I would think of is the bad configuration of tunneling.

#Nzbget port forwarding router web add nzb update

Would you uninstall your antivirus the instant your update subscription expired? I'll bet not.Īnyways, I'm done with this. should be accessible (assuming you have port-forwarded on your router) on. Will it stop a 2-year old exploit? Likely. Com Sonarr (formerly NZBdrone) is a PVR for usenet and bittorrent users. In answer to your question, yes, I would proffer the installation of an outdated antivirus as improving one's security, albeit slightly. I just wanted to offer a potentially helpful suggestion. I wasn't prepared to butt heads with the VPN love-in. I'm all for increasing one's security as much as possible. My objection is to being impugned as somehow offering BAD advice. If you read my original post, you'll see that I neither presented mine as THE solution nor as completely safe, only as an improvement over what the OP has already indicated was his end condition. We're just covering our butts by recommending what we know to be the best option to accomplish what was asked. Better to properly educate to the best of what's available than to tell someone that it's ok to just do the minimum, and then get blamed when something bad happens.

#Nzbget port forwarding router web add nzb install

Would you recommend that someone install an old copy of norton on a windows pc because it is a step towards security? Now that person thinks they have antivirus, and wonders why they get hacked when they browse a crack site. Even if the 'obscurity' method deflects 99% of attempts, if you leave it long enough it will get hacked by that 1% and that is enough. I think the position is more properly stated as 'Don't give yourself a false sense of security'. Is your position- do everything or do NOTHING? If OP is unable/unwilling to set up a VPN, that simple step WILL decrease the number of random probes on well-known ports. I'm confused why you consider it 'bad practice' to decrease the chances of attack. map the NZBGet internal port (8989) to an Docker Sonarr V3 - docker-compose.

At the very least use a very long random password. to add another component to docker compose, you simply list another service. This provides a very false sense of security.Ī VPN provides real security that will stop attackers, not just slow them down. This is called 'security though obscurity' and is a bad practice. It's a relatively simple step that will cut down on the number of drive-by probes your system will receive, and lessens the chance someone might do something really bad to you. Having the standard ports open, makes it much more likely for your system to be discovered by someone scanning a range of IPs for, say, port 8989 (Sonarr.) Configure your router to forward some obscure ports to the standard ports within your internal network.

Don't simply open up the ports normally associated with CP/Sonarr/NZB/etc. May be these links help you - ashr wrote: I keep getting the error - NZBGetWeb could not process response received from NZBGet-Server (although successfully connected). You don't need the web-interface to start nzbget. If I may, I'd suggest you remap the ports open to the net. You should first properly setup nzbget and only then configure the web-interface. So you would go to :5050 for example for CouchPotato. Your best bet would be to setup duckdns (for free) and link everything up to a website.